Washington—Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) today introduced the Protecting Immigrant Families and Improving Immigration Procedures Act, a bill that addresses several pressing problems in U.S. immigration policy. The bill is cosponsored by Senators Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.).
What the bill does:
Senator Feinstein released the following statement:
“Families and children continue to flee from El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras to seek asylum at our southern border. While at the same time trying to address the underlying causes of this migration, we must also treat these families humanely when they arrive. That’s the focused goal of this bill.
More resources: “In order to help clear the backlog of more than 800,000 immigration cases, the bill provides funds to increase the number of immigration judge teams by 75. Additional funds will also be provided so unaccompanied children and toddlers aren’t forced to represent themselves in complex legal proceedings.
Family separations: “The most urgent problem addressed by this bill is that of family separations, which would be prohibited. We know that family separations continue today, and we now know thousands more families may have been separated than previously revealed. This remains an urgent problem that must be addressed.
Flores Agreement: “The bill ensures that families with children aren’t forced into indefinite detention. This is achieved by rejecting regulations proposed by the Trump administration that would overturn the Flores Settlement Agreement. This agreement, reached following a 1997 court case, requires the expedited release of children to parents, adult relatives or licensed programs. It also requires that facilities provide families with essentials like food, water and emergency medical care.
“Taken as whole, this bill is designed to help protect vulnerable immigrant children while providing the resources necessary for the immigration system to work more efficiently. By design it’s not a comprehensive bill, but rather one to address a time-sensitive matter at our southern border.”