WASHINGTON – Senate
Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley led 23
Senate colleagues in calling on the administration to avoid any further,
unnecessary delay in providing its views on an Antiterrorism Act case.
The case is currently pending a grant of certiorari from the Supreme Court of
the United States.
The
bipartisan letter follows an
amicus brief filed by
Grassley and several colleagues in April on this case urging the court to
review a federal appeals court decision undermining the ability of U.S. victims
of international terrorism to seek justice. The appeals court’s decision
effectively nullified the
Antiterrorism
Act of 1992,
a law passed by Congress—and championed by Grassley—specifically intended to
protect Americans abroad and to provide victims with a tool to bring terrorists
to justice in U.S. courts.
“Twenty-five
years ago, I led the Senate’s effort to improve justice for Americans
victimized by acts of terrorism abroad. By passing the Antiterrorism Act,
Congress’s intent was clear: U.S. victims of international terrorism should be
able to seek justice in U.S. courts against those responsible, no matter where
the attacks occurred,” Grassley said. “The 2nd
Circuit’s decision disregarded the central purpose of the Antiterrorism Act,
and could leave U.S. victims of terror abroad without important tools to seek
justice. The Supreme Court should review this case and restore Congress’ action
to hold terrorists accountable, and the administration should waste no time in
weighing in on the issue.”
The
case, Sokolow v. Palestine Liberation Organization, involves U.S.
victims of terrorist attacks occurring in Israel in the early 2000s. In 2004,
the victims sued the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Palestinian
Authority (PA) under the Antiterrorism Act to recover damages. In 2015,
after more than a decade of litigation, a unanimous jury awarded $655 million
to the victims, finding that officers of the PA perpetrated several of the
attacks and that the PLO and PA provided support to terrorist organizations
involved in the attacks. On appeal, however, the 2nd U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals reversed the lower court’s verdict, reasoning that the PLO and
PA are protected from U.S. court jurisdiction in the suit because the attacks
“were not sufficiently connected to the
United States” and were not “specifically targeted against United States
citizens.”
On
June 26, 2017, the Supreme Court requested the views of the United States
before it determines whether to grant certiorari in the case. It has been over
three months since the Court’s request, with little indication that the
administration will provide its views anytime soon.
Leading the letter with Grassley are senators Marco
Rubio (R-Fla.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Ct.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Ted
Cruz (R-Texas) and Chris Coons (D-Del.). Other signatories include Senators
John Cornyn (R-Texas), Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Tammy
Baldwin (D-Mich.), Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Thom Tillis
(R-N.C.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), John Boozman (R-Ark.), Catherine Cortez
Masto (D-Nev.), James Risch (R-Idaho), Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), James Inhofe
(R-Okla.), Bob Casey (D-Penn.), Dean Heller (R-Nev.), Ron Wyden (D-Org.), Susan
Collins (R-Maine) and R-Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.).
Full
text of the
letter
follows.
October 26,
2017
VIA
ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION
The
Honorable Jeff Sessions The Honorable Rex W. Tillerson
Attorney
General Secretary of State
U.S.
Department of Justice U.S. Department of State
950
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 2201 C Street, N.W.
Washington,
D.C. 20530 Washington, D.C. 20520
Dear
Attorney General Sessions and Secretary Tillerson:
On June 26, 2017, the Supreme Court
called for the views of the Solicitor General in Sokolow v. PLO, No.
16-1071, a case concerning the Anti-Terrorism Act of 1992 (“ATA”) that is
currently on petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Second Circuit. We write to strongly urge the Administration to
avoid any unnecessary delay and respond as soon as possible to the Court’s
request for views in this important matter.
Passed largely in response to the
Palestine Liberation Organization’s 1985 murder of U.S. citizen Leon
Klinghoffer aboard an Italian cruise ship, the ATA provides that perpetrators
or supporters of international terrorism may be brought to justice in U.S.
courts for injuring U.S. citizens regardless of where the injuries occurred. To
accomplish this, the ATA provides for extraterritorial jurisdiction over
terrorist acts abroad against Americans. As you know, both the State Department
and Justice Department supported the enactment of the ATA.
In Sokolow, the ATA worked just
as Congress intended: American victims secured a unanimous verdict against the
PLO and Palestinian Authority (“PA”), whom the jury found liable for
perpetrating and materially supporting acts of international terrorism abroad
against U.S. citizens. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, however,
vacated the jury’s decision, holding that the PLO and PA were protected from
U.S. courts’ exercise of jurisdiction because the terror attacks “were not
sufficiently connected to the United States.”
Ironically, the Second Circuit’s
decision throwing out the verdict for lack of jurisdiction is precisely the
result that the ATA was enacted to avoid. If left to stand, the decision casts
severe doubt on the continued ability of other American victims of
international terrorist attacks to obtain some semblance of justice in our
nation’s courts against the perpetrators, and undermines a key counterterrorism
tool that was deliberately crafted by Congress with the support and assistance
of your Departments.
The Sokolow plaintiffs have
since filed a petition for certiorari, and amicus briefs were promptly
filed in support thereof by the House of Representatives and a bipartisan group
of twenty-three United States senators. It has now been over three months,
however, since the Court requested the views of the United States, with little
indication at this time that such views will soon be provided to the Court.
The case is now in its fourteenth year.
One of the plaintiffs—the father of a boy killed in a bombing at the Frank
Sinatra International Student Center in Jerusalem—has already died without
seeing the case finalized. Justice for American victims of international
terrorism should not be delayed any longer.
Accordingly, we urge the Administration
to demonstrate its resolve to combat international terrorism and put American
victims first by avoiding any unnecessary delay and responding as soon as
possible to the Supreme Court’s request for the views of the United States in
this matter.
Sincerely,
-30-