WASHINGTON – Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), ranking
member of the Committee on the Judiciary, today warned Democrats against
rushing the Senate’s constitutional “advice and consent” role to meet an
unnecessary artificial timeline to vote on President Biden’s Supreme Court
nominee. Committee chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) announced a truncated vetting timeline
just days after the nomination was announced, before even seeking records
necessary to begin a complete review.
“Vetting a nominee for a lifetime appointment to the
high court is serious business. The American people rightly expect a full and
thorough vetting process. We should not sacrifice the integrity of our
constitutional advice and consent responsibility to meet an arbitrary timeline.
The Court’s next term doesn’t begin until October, so there’s absolutely no
need to rush,” Grassley said.
For
recent Supreme Court nominees who’ve had prior federal government service, the
committee’s pre-hearing vet process has taken, on average, 53 days to allow sufficient
time to receive and review records related to the nominee’s government service.
Chairman Durbin’s proposed timeline allows for only 24 days – less than half
the normal timeline for recent nominees with prior government service.
Judge
Ketanji Brown Jackson’s prior service on the U.S. Sentencing Commission and as
a federal public defender, including her time representing a Guantanamo Bay
detainee, warrant the same scrutiny provided to the government records of other
Supreme Court nominees. Announcing a hearing date before even seeking these
records in order to meet an ahistoric timeline risks casting doubt on the
thoroughness of the vetting process.
-30-